<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Concealed Carry Holsters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://concealedcarryholsters.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://concealedcarryholsters.org</link>
	<description>Your guide to finding the right concealed carry holster.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Test Your Reaction Time by tanner winward</title>
		<link>http://concealedcarryholsters.org/test-your-reaction-time/comment-page-1/#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator>tanner winward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concealedcarryholsters.org/?p=27#comment-1724</guid>
		<description>HOLY SHIT AVERAGE TIME .07 
pic:http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y298/ace1122/11111111111.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOLY SHIT AVERAGE TIME .07<br />
pic:http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y298/ace1122/11111111111.jpg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Test Your Reaction Time by tanner winward</title>
		<link>http://concealedcarryholsters.org/test-your-reaction-time/comment-page-1/#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator>tanner winward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concealedcarryholsters.org/?p=27#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>1 .117
2 .125
3 .117
4 .14
5 .11
average .121</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 .117<br />
2 .125<br />
3 .117<br />
4 .14<br />
5 .11<br />
average .121</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outside Waistband Holsters (OWB) by Jim Oakley</title>
		<link>http://concealedcarryholsters.org/outside-waistband-holster/comment-page-1/#comment-1713</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Oakley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concealedcarryholsters.org/?page_id=8#comment-1713</guid>
		<description>I absolutely love my Blackhawk Serpa CQC OWB holster!  I tried the Fobus for a while and I was not happy with it.  This holster does not have a thumb brake, but it does have an index finger trigger guard release button.  The holster rides high on your hip, so it is fairly easy to conceal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely love my Blackhawk Serpa CQC OWB holster!  I tried the Fobus for a while and I was not happy with it.  This holster does not have a thumb brake, but it does have an index finger trigger guard release button.  The holster rides high on your hip, so it is fairly easy to conceal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Smartcarry&#8221; Holsters by Michael</title>
		<link>http://concealedcarryholsters.org/smartcarry-style-holster/comment-page-1/#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concealedcarryholsters.org/?page_id=12#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>I tend to wear alot of t-shirts....rarely wear a jacket. would this type of carry work for me, or do i need to go with a different method</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to wear alot of t-shirts&#8230;.rarely wear a jacket. would this type of carry work for me, or do i need to go with a different method</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inside Waistband Holsters (IWB) by Paul</title>
		<link>http://concealedcarryholsters.org/inside-waistband-holster/comment-page-2/#comment-1701</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concealedcarryholsters.org/?page_id=9#comment-1701</guid>
		<description>I have a Springfield XD-M 40 SW service model 4" barrel. I was wondering if it is best to conceal in a IWB or shoulder holster? It's a heavier than the glock so I didn't know if it would be easier to use a shoulder holster. I also am looking to purchase a Beretta Px4 storm and was wondering the same thing about it. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Springfield XD-M 40 SW service model 4&#8243; barrel. I was wondering if it is best to conceal in a IWB or shoulder holster? It&#8217;s a heavier than the glock so I didn&#8217;t know if it would be easier to use a shoulder holster. I also am looking to purchase a Beretta Px4 storm and was wondering the same thing about it. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spotting a Concealed Handgun by lilbear68</title>
		<link>http://concealedcarryholsters.org/spotting-a-concealed-handgun/comment-page-1/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>lilbear68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concealedcarryholsters.org/?p=16#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>we won thave to worry about being taken over by an invading force like the movie 'red dawn' were gonna be beaten down from within from out habit of re-electing traitors to congress
obama removed the tax break for co.'s movin jobs out of state, lol the jobs are all gone now whats the point?  we need to hunt down the sob's that allowed it in the first place</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we won thave to worry about being taken over by an invading force like the movie &#8216;red dawn&#8217; were gonna be beaten down from within from out habit of re-electing traitors to congress<br />
obama removed the tax break for co.&#8217;s movin jobs out of state, lol the jobs are all gone now whats the point?  we need to hunt down the sob&#8217;s that allowed it in the first place</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spotting a Concealed Handgun by Andre Fiker</title>
		<link>http://concealedcarryholsters.org/spotting-a-concealed-handgun/comment-page-1/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Fiker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concealedcarryholsters.org/?p=16#comment-1684</guid>
		<description>Hey, I got here a little late in the party... I'm from Brazil, and very much interested in this discussion. Unlike the vast majority of people who spoke here and who speaks about these topic anywhere, I do not have a formed opinion. I can't decide if people should be allowed to carry with or without restriction, or if we should go the other way and try to lessen the number of guns around. I find very compeling arguments for both sides, and that irks me, because i'm a man of strong opinions and normaly fast (maybe even too fast) to judge, and in this matter I simply do not find myself able to do so. 
This matter envolves so many layers... Upper layers such as predicted on the making of the second ammendment, a right to bear arms in order to be able to protect yourself from corrupt governments. Somewhat recently, in Brazil, we had such a government, we called it ditadura, can't remember the yank (or brit) name for it. People were tortured, disapeared,the works. I can't help to think, how diferently could it have been if we had a strong gun carrying policy then, as citiziens? On the other hand I think of all the messed up people (i'm a psychologist, so I have a vague idea of how many ways there are to be messed up, and how many of them are inconspicuous), all the road rage, all the bar fights and house disturbance cases, and I can't help but thinking what it would do to our killing rates if you distributed guns to all those people. It is a very complicated scenario, and it includes a thousand intrinsic and extrinsic variables, and, well, it baffles me. Really does. So I like to see people discussing it, there were several good points in this forum, and I think this is a very important discussion indeed. And I really want to get my head straight on these and pick a side, but i'm starting to think, as the robot in that novel, that maybe there just isn't 'sufficient data for a significative conclusion'.
Hope someone still comes here once in a while, it would be nice to see an answer to my post.
So long! (and so sorry about my butchering of the great english language, i just don't have enough opportunities to practice...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I got here a little late in the party&#8230; I&#8217;m from Brazil, and very much interested in this discussion. Unlike the vast majority of people who spoke here and who speaks about these topic anywhere, I do not have a formed opinion. I can&#8217;t decide if people should be allowed to carry with or without restriction, or if we should go the other way and try to lessen the number of guns around. I find very compeling arguments for both sides, and that irks me, because i&#8217;m a man of strong opinions and normaly fast (maybe even too fast) to judge, and in this matter I simply do not find myself able to do so.<br />
This matter envolves so many layers&#8230; Upper layers such as predicted on the making of the second ammendment, a right to bear arms in order to be able to protect yourself from corrupt governments. Somewhat recently, in Brazil, we had such a government, we called it ditadura, can&#8217;t remember the yank (or brit) name for it. People were tortured, disapeared,the works. I can&#8217;t help to think, how diferently could it have been if we had a strong gun carrying policy then, as citiziens? On the other hand I think of all the messed up people (i&#8217;m a psychologist, so I have a vague idea of how many ways there are to be messed up, and how many of them are inconspicuous), all the road rage, all the bar fights and house disturbance cases, and I can&#8217;t help but thinking what it would do to our killing rates if you distributed guns to all those people. It is a very complicated scenario, and it includes a thousand intrinsic and extrinsic variables, and, well, it baffles me. Really does. So I like to see people discussing it, there were several good points in this forum, and I think this is a very important discussion indeed. And I really want to get my head straight on these and pick a side, but i&#8217;m starting to think, as the robot in that novel, that maybe there just isn&#8217;t &#8217;sufficient data for a significative conclusion&#8217;.<br />
Hope someone still comes here once in a while, it would be nice to see an answer to my post.<br />
So long! (and so sorry about my butchering of the great english language, i just don&#8217;t have enough opportunities to practice&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inside Waistband Holsters (IWB) by allen</title>
		<link>http://concealedcarryholsters.org/inside-waistband-holster/comment-page-2/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concealedcarryholsters.org/?page_id=9#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>don hume has good iwb holsters for bersa thunder 380
the pcch works great .also there clip on would be a good choise.
last but not least the pocket holster is not bad .i have all three
all are very well made  for owb galco stinger is a great choise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don hume has good iwb holsters for bersa thunder 380<br />
the pcch works great .also there clip on would be a good choise.<br />
last but not least the pocket holster is not bad .i have all three<br />
all are very well made  for owb galco stinger is a great choise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spotting a Concealed Handgun by HickMan</title>
		<link>http://concealedcarryholsters.org/spotting-a-concealed-handgun/comment-page-1/#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>HickMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concealedcarryholsters.org/?p=16#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>This has been an interesting read...engaging debates right?

Anyways, I would like to add another perspective/point here, particularly to address Tony's questions.

I live in Maine.  As most of us know, there is nothing in the state of Maine that even approaches a "big city."  In fact, the entire state has a population of under a million and a half (that's roughly a fifth of NYC).  We are a very light state.  That being said, I carry.  We have a few different reasons though:

1) Geography.  Small state population wise, yes--geographically no.  If someone kicks in your door (happens more frequently than you might think since neighbors often can't even see each others' homes) and you call the police, you can expect to wait 45+ minutes for an arrival.  This is not because of laziness, since in all likeliness you know your sheriff personally, but simply because of the vast areas covered in each jurisdiction and the rural nature of most homes.  Luckily for Mainers, many of us own and are proficient with firearms.  We have a very different gun culture than is seen in other places.  Most of us grew up with guns and have hunted with and practiced with them since before we were adults.  They are tools, just the same as a hammer.

2) Time spent in true isolation.  Ever try to get cell reception in the middle of the woods while you're hunting or fishing?  Well, it might work in some places, but not here.  If I find myself in trouble out in the woods, whether it be a bear, wolf, lynx, moose, or armed jackass--I am shit-outta-luck if I can't take care of myself.  I for one would much rather take my chances with my Glock than with my Buck knife.

3) Coming back to this tool idea.  A firearm can be a very useful thing to have.  I've seen them used for many non-standard uses.  The most interesting one in my opinion was tree limb removal (it was a shotgun, don't worry.  No fears about backdrop there).  Anyways, it isn't hard to come up non-conventional uses of a firearm.

Just a thought or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been an interesting read&#8230;engaging debates right?</p>
<p>Anyways, I would like to add another perspective/point here, particularly to address Tony&#8217;s questions.</p>
<p>I live in Maine.  As most of us know, there is nothing in the state of Maine that even approaches a &#8220;big city.&#8221;  In fact, the entire state has a population of under a million and a half (that&#8217;s roughly a fifth of NYC).  We are a very light state.  That being said, I carry.  We have a few different reasons though:</p>
<p>1) Geography.  Small state population wise, yes&#8211;geographically no.  If someone kicks in your door (happens more frequently than you might think since neighbors often can&#8217;t even see each others&#8217; homes) and you call the police, you can expect to wait 45+ minutes for an arrival.  This is not because of laziness, since in all likeliness you know your sheriff personally, but simply because of the vast areas covered in each jurisdiction and the rural nature of most homes.  Luckily for Mainers, many of us own and are proficient with firearms.  We have a very different gun culture than is seen in other places.  Most of us grew up with guns and have hunted with and practiced with them since before we were adults.  They are tools, just the same as a hammer.</p>
<p>2) Time spent in true isolation.  Ever try to get cell reception in the middle of the woods while you&#8217;re hunting or fishing?  Well, it might work in some places, but not here.  If I find myself in trouble out in the woods, whether it be a bear, wolf, lynx, moose, or armed jackass&#8211;I am shit-outta-luck if I can&#8217;t take care of myself.  I for one would much rather take my chances with my Glock than with my Buck knife.</p>
<p>3) Coming back to this tool idea.  A firearm can be a very useful thing to have.  I&#8217;ve seen them used for many non-standard uses.  The most interesting one in my opinion was tree limb removal (it was a shotgun, don&#8217;t worry.  No fears about backdrop there).  Anyways, it isn&#8217;t hard to come up non-conventional uses of a firearm.</p>
<p>Just a thought or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pocket Holsters by Frank Hols</title>
		<link>http://concealedcarryholsters.org/pocket-holsters/comment-page-1/#comment-1669</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Hols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concealedcarryholsters.org/?page_id=15#comment-1669</guid>
		<description>Yup, same here - recently purchased a  738 TCP and looking for a good pocket holster. Great gun by the way - over 200 rounds with no hiccups (four differnt brands, two HP's)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, same here - recently purchased a  738 TCP and looking for a good pocket holster. Great gun by the way - over 200 rounds with no hiccups (four differnt brands, two HP&#8217;s)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
